Skip to main content

What the letter read released regarding the Epstein files today


This is as best as we can decipher...It may not be grammatically correct..simple writing out what was written. 

In terms of the thought process, have dramatically changed the landscape. At the time, you were unaware of stories unprecedented, you were unaware of stories alleged for published procedures, you were unaware of the wildly exaggerated list of victims. You were unaware of the strong feds link. You were certainly unaware of the most troubling breach of ethics, the prosecutor's manual, consistent with the new york times. That aside, BASED ON THE NEW FACTS, and ON the case that have received every case previously brought, there are now new facts alone. they isn't the case in which attempt such a policy. The strong feds manual will they won't need to debate whether or not the policy is policy. Policy manual, and its prominent appearance and than disappearance in the documents, would ensure that you however to seriously reconsider our proposal. Not only on ethics, but as a colleague, I strongly urge you to accept it. You have an out about the acceptance this will bring. local closure to all outstanding and extremely problematic cases. I have issues. I'm sure you understand. I have not sent you a letter as I promised you within a week of a report, that might lead to months and months of continuous litigation. That being said, I truly realize that you will have to explain such a big change of position from prostitution to the FBI and the people who's work you have to protect. The people that worked on this case. They could be accused that you would be giving them more than the statue is still willing to accept. The victims would be secondary to... I'm confident that our proposal is both principled and fair. The one thing is that the facts. you recognize that the fed statues would have to be presented to hi. I fear that if this is not resolved quickly, the moral issues involved with, with the police will bring about comments of tarnish. And frankly, I don't think that should be an issue either. Regarding (f) I think this is a middle ground. Of Alan Dershowitz, and him, and also in reference either Bob senor or washington. I have more confidence in Washington. I believe that the fed statues don't apply. 

Popular posts from this blog

📢 Social Media Statement: Defending Free Speech Against Surveillance

​ 🚨 ATTENTION: To any government agency or operative monitoring this account: ​I am an American Citizen. My activity on this platform is a direct exercise of my First Amendment right to Free Speech . ​ I am not organizing, promoting, or engaging in political violence. I am exercising my right to speak out about government actions, alleged corruption, and perceived abuse, and I maintain my right to attend PEACEFUL assemblies to advocate for change. ​Any attempt by a U.S. government entity (including law enforcement, intelligence agencies, or operatives using surveillance or fake accounts) to: ​ Spy on or track my lawful political speech. ​ Gather information to falsely claim a law is being broken. ​ Engage in entrapment based on my expression of dissent. ​...is a direct and illegal violation of my Constitutional rights. ​The recent National Security Presidential Memorandum NSPM-7 —which critics fear is redefining legitimate opposition as "domestic terrorism" an...

The Democratic Counter-Force: New Voices Rising Against the MAGA Movement

By M. Grey ​The political landscape is shifting. A powerful, outspoken coalition of liberal Democrats—from Congress to the cutting edge of digital media—is meeting the narratives of the MAGA movement with an unapologetic and aggressive defense of democratic ideals. They are the new voices of democracy, and they are not afraid to speak up. ​💥 Exposing the Engine of Influence: The Alleged MAGA Playbook ​A core mission of this counter-movement is to pull back the curtain on the tactics allegedly used to cultivate and sustain the movement's fervent base. Commentators argue that a calculating performance is broadcast to elicit emotional and financial returns from followers: ​ Lying on Camera: Systematically promoting demonstrable falsehoods to create a separate reality for their base. ​ Crying on Cue: Using manufactured moments of outrage or victimhood to generate sympathy and fervor. ​ The Follower Funding Machine: Sitting back as these performances allegedly prompt millions...

Delivery Nightmares: Examining the Thousands of Complaints Against UNI UNI, a Temu Logistics Partner

Reported by M.Grey Harp on the Truth  __________________________ UNI UMi (also frequently referred to as UniUni) is a last-mile delivery service that has become a key logistics partner for major e-commerce platforms, including the rapidly growing online marketplace, Temu . However, a surge in customer complaints across review platforms and social media suggests significant service disruptions, with customers reporting issues ranging from undelivered packages to alleged deceitful delivery practices.   The Problem: A Flood of Negative Feedback While the exact count of "thousands of complaints" is difficult to verify across various unstructured online sources, the volume and nature of negative customer feedback regarding UniUni are striking. A substantial portion of online reviews points to a pattern of frustration, often specifically linking the issues to orders placed on platforms like Temu. Common complaints leveled against UniUni incl...