Skip to main content

What the letter read released regarding the Epstein files today


This is as best as we can decipher...It may not be grammatically correct..simple writing out what was wrotten
local police at all. In terms of the thought process, have dramatically changed the landscape. At the time, you were unaware of stories unprecedented, you were unaware of stories alleged for published procedures, you were unaware of the wildly exaggerated list of victims. You were unaware of the strong feds link. You were certainly unaware of the most troubling breach of ethics, the prosecutor's manual, consistent with the new york times. That aside, BASED ON THE NEW FACTS, and ON the case that have received every case previously brought, there are now new facts alone. they isn't the case in which attempt such a policy. The strong feds manual will they won't need to debate whether or not the policy is policy. Policy manual, and its prominent appearance and than disappearance in the documents, would ensure that you however to seriously reconsider our proposal. Not only on ethics, but as a colleague, I strongly urge you to accept it. You have an out about the acceptance this will bring. local closure to all outstanding and extremely problematic cases. I have issues. I'm sure you understand. I have not sent you a letter as I promised you within a week of a report, that might lead to months and months of continuous litigation. That being said, I truly realize that you will have to explain such a big change of position from prostitution to the FBI and the people who's work you have to protect. The people that worked on this case. They could be accused that you would be giving them more than the statue is still willing to accept. The victims would be secondary to... I'm confident that our proposal is both principled and fair. The one thing is that the facts. you recognize that the fed statues would have to be presented to hi. I fear that if this is not resolved quickly, the moral issues in volved with, with the police will bring about comments of tarnish. And frankly, I don't think that should be an issue either. Regarding (f) I think this is a middle ground. Of Alan Dershowitz, and him, and also in reference either Bob senor or washington. I have more confidence in Washington. I believe that the fed statues don't apply. we

Popular posts from this blog

📢 Social Media Statement: Defending Free Speech Against Surveillance

​ 🚨 ATTENTION: To any government agency or operative monitoring this account: ​I am an American Citizen. My activity on this platform is a direct exercise of my First Amendment right to Free Speech . ​ I am not organizing, promoting, or engaging in political violence. I am exercising my right to speak out about government actions, alleged corruption, and perceived abuse, and I maintain my right to attend PEACEFUL assemblies to advocate for change. ​Any attempt by a U.S. government entity (including law enforcement, intelligence agencies, or operatives using surveillance or fake accounts) to: ​ Spy on or track my lawful political speech. ​ Gather information to falsely claim a law is being broken. ​ Engage in entrapment based on my expression of dissent. ​...is a direct and illegal violation of my Constitutional rights. ​The recent National Security Presidential Memorandum NSPM-7 —which critics fear is redefining legitimate opposition as "domestic terrorism" an...
Read more

The Democratic Counter-Force: New Voices Rising Against the MAGA Movement

By M. Grey ​The political landscape is shifting. A powerful, outspoken coalition of liberal Democrats—from Congress to the cutting edge of digital media—is meeting the narratives of the MAGA movement with an unapologetic and aggressive defense of democratic ideals. They are the new voices of democracy, and they are not afraid to speak up. ​💥 Exposing the Engine of Influence: The Alleged MAGA Playbook ​A core mission of this counter-movement is to pull back the curtain on the tactics allegedly used to cultivate and sustain the movement's fervent base. Commentators argue that a calculating performance is broadcast to elicit emotional and financial returns from followers: ​ Lying on Camera: Systematically promoting demonstrable falsehoods to create a separate reality for their base. ​ Crying on Cue: Using manufactured moments of outrage or victimhood to generate sympathy and fervor. ​ The Follower Funding Machine: Sitting back as these performances allegedly prompt millions...
Read more

The $1 Billion Blunder: Did Melania Trump's Threat Just Hand Michael Wolff a Subpoena to the Epstein Files?

The $1 Billion Blunder: Did Melania Trump's Threat Just Hand Michael Wolff a Subpoena to the Epstein Files? NEW YORK, NY—In a legal escalation that has seized public attention, Michael Wolff, the author known for his disruptive books on the Trump administration, has flipped the script on Melania Trump's billion-dollar defamation threat, using the challenge as an immediate launching pad to demand sworn testimony about the Trumps' ties to Jeffrey Epstein.   The stunning turn of events stems from a legal letter sent by the former First Lady’s attorney, demanding Wolff retract and apologize for statements made in social media videos and a podcast. The claims centered on the assertion that Melania Trump was "very involved" in Epstein's social circle where she met her husband, and that the marriage was a "sham". The letter threatened a lawsuit for over $1 billion in damages, alleging the comments caused "overwhelming reputational and financial harm....
Read more