Skip to main content

U.S Attorneys Generals & FBI during the time that the women reported Epstein's abuse.


U.S. Attorneys General (1990–Present)

The Attorney General is the head of the Department of Justice and the chief law enforcement officer of the federal government.

Name Tenure Administration

Dick Thornburgh Aug 1988 – Aug 1991 G.H.W. Bush

William P. Barr Nov 1991 – Jan 1993 G.H.W. Bush

Janet Reno Mar 1993 – Jan 2001 Clinton

John Ashcroft Feb 2001 – Feb 2005 G.W. Bush

Alberto Gonzales Feb 2005 – Sept 2007 G.W. Bush

Michael Mukasey Nov 2007 – Jan 2009 G.W. Bush

Eric Holder Feb 2009 – Apr 2015 Obama

Loretta Lynch Apr 2015 – Jan 2017 Obama

Jeff Sessions Feb 2017 – Nov 2018 Trump

William P. Barr Feb 2019 – Dec 2020 Trump

Merrick Garland Mar 2021 – Jan 2025 Biden

Pam Bondi Jan 2025 – Present Trump

Note: William P. Barr is the only person in modern history to serve two non-consecutive terms as Attorney General.

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION DIRECTORS 

Directors of the FBI (1990–Present)

While Attorneys General often change with each administration, FBI Directors are appointed to 10-year terms to maintain political independence, though they can be removed by the President.   

Name Tenure Notable Notes

William S. Sessions Nov 1987 – July 1993 Dismissed by President Clinton.

Floyd I. Clarke July 1993 – Sept 1993 Acting Director

Louis Freeh Sept 1993 – June 2001 Resigned.

Thomas J. Pickard June 2001 – Sept 2001 Acting Director during 9/11

Robert Mueller Sept 2001 – Sept 2013 Term extended by 2 years by Congress.

James Comey Sept 2013 – May 2017 Dismissed by President Trump.

Andrew McCabe May 2017 – Aug 2017 Acting Director

Christopher Wray Aug 2017 – Jan 2025 Resigned.

Paul Abbate Jan 2025 – Feb 2025 Acting Director

Kash Patel Feb 2025 – Present Current Director.





Popular posts from this blog

📢 Social Media Statement: Defending Free Speech Against Surveillance

​ 🚨 ATTENTION: To any government agency or operative monitoring this account: ​I am an American Citizen. My activity on this platform is a direct exercise of my First Amendment right to Free Speech . ​ I am not organizing, promoting, or engaging in political violence. I am exercising my right to speak out about government actions, alleged corruption, and perceived abuse, and I maintain my right to attend PEACEFUL assemblies to advocate for change. ​Any attempt by a U.S. government entity (including law enforcement, intelligence agencies, or operatives using surveillance or fake accounts) to: ​ Spy on or track my lawful political speech. ​ Gather information to falsely claim a law is being broken. ​ Engage in entrapment based on my expression of dissent. ​...is a direct and illegal violation of my Constitutional rights. ​The recent National Security Presidential Memorandum NSPM-7 —which critics fear is redefining legitimate opposition as "domestic terrorism" an...
Read more

The Democratic Counter-Force: New Voices Rising Against the MAGA Movement

By M. Grey ​The political landscape is shifting. A powerful, outspoken coalition of liberal Democrats—from Congress to the cutting edge of digital media—is meeting the narratives of the MAGA movement with an unapologetic and aggressive defense of democratic ideals. They are the new voices of democracy, and they are not afraid to speak up. ​💥 Exposing the Engine of Influence: The Alleged MAGA Playbook ​A core mission of this counter-movement is to pull back the curtain on the tactics allegedly used to cultivate and sustain the movement's fervent base. Commentators argue that a calculating performance is broadcast to elicit emotional and financial returns from followers: ​ Lying on Camera: Systematically promoting demonstrable falsehoods to create a separate reality for their base. ​ Crying on Cue: Using manufactured moments of outrage or victimhood to generate sympathy and fervor. ​ The Follower Funding Machine: Sitting back as these performances allegedly prompt millions...
Read more

The $1 Billion Blunder: Did Melania Trump's Threat Just Hand Michael Wolff a Subpoena to the Epstein Files?

The $1 Billion Blunder: Did Melania Trump's Threat Just Hand Michael Wolff a Subpoena to the Epstein Files? NEW YORK, NY—In a legal escalation that has seized public attention, Michael Wolff, the author known for his disruptive books on the Trump administration, has flipped the script on Melania Trump's billion-dollar defamation threat, using the challenge as an immediate launching pad to demand sworn testimony about the Trumps' ties to Jeffrey Epstein.   The stunning turn of events stems from a legal letter sent by the former First Lady’s attorney, demanding Wolff retract and apologize for statements made in social media videos and a podcast. The claims centered on the assertion that Melania Trump was "very involved" in Epstein's social circle where she met her husband, and that the marriage was a "sham". The letter threatened a lawsuit for over $1 billion in damages, alleging the comments caused "overwhelming reputational and financial harm....
Read more