Skip to main content

THE UNCLASSIFIED EPSTEIN DOCUMENT: CASE # 50D-NY-3027571, 11- 27-2020




This page appears to be part of an unclassified government investigative document dated October 27, 2020, referencing case number 50D-NY-3027571. It contains heavily redacted testimony or interview notes involving multiple individuals, with allegations concerning Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey Epstein.

Here’s a summary of the key points from the visible text:

- A limousine driver in the Dallas/Fort Worth area claimed to have picked up Donald Trump in 1993 and overheard disturbing comments during the ride. He reported Trump repeatedly said “Jeffrey” and made references to “abusing some girl” while on the phone.
- The driver allegedly felt so disturbed by what he heard that he considered pulling over and physically confronting Trump.
- Another individual claimed Trump and Epstein had raped her, referencing a girl with a “funny name” who brought her to a hotel.
- One person was advised to call the police but feared retaliation, saying “they will kill me.”
- On Christmas Day, she reportedly did call the police and was later praised for doing so.
- On January 10, 2000, it was reported that this individual was found dead in Kiefer, Oklahoma, with her head “blown off.” While officers on the scene doubted suicide, the coroner ruled it as such. Another person speculated it was a cover-up involving Ghislaine (likely Ghislaine Maxwell).
- The last contact with this individual occurred after someone posted the story on Facebook, which led to a heated call warning that the family was now in danger.
- The document ends with a mention of “John Doe No.2” being identified as “John,” though the context is cut off.

Let me know if you’d like help breaking down the timeline, identifying public sources that reference this document, or exploring related cases.

Reported by
Tres Rivers, 
Investigative Journalist 
Harp on the Truth 

Popular posts from this blog

📢 Social Media Statement: Defending Free Speech Against Surveillance

​ 🚨 ATTENTION: To any government agency or operative monitoring this account: ​I am an American Citizen. My activity on this platform is a direct exercise of my First Amendment right to Free Speech . ​ I am not organizing, promoting, or engaging in political violence. I am exercising my right to speak out about government actions, alleged corruption, and perceived abuse, and I maintain my right to attend PEACEFUL assemblies to advocate for change. ​Any attempt by a U.S. government entity (including law enforcement, intelligence agencies, or operatives using surveillance or fake accounts) to: ​ Spy on or track my lawful political speech. ​ Gather information to falsely claim a law is being broken. ​ Engage in entrapment based on my expression of dissent. ​...is a direct and illegal violation of my Constitutional rights. ​The recent National Security Presidential Memorandum NSPM-7 —which critics fear is redefining legitimate opposition as "domestic terrorism" an...

The Democratic Counter-Force: New Voices Rising Against the MAGA Movement

By M. Grey ​The political landscape is shifting. A powerful, outspoken coalition of liberal Democrats—from Congress to the cutting edge of digital media—is meeting the narratives of the MAGA movement with an unapologetic and aggressive defense of democratic ideals. They are the new voices of democracy, and they are not afraid to speak up. ​💥 Exposing the Engine of Influence: The Alleged MAGA Playbook ​A core mission of this counter-movement is to pull back the curtain on the tactics allegedly used to cultivate and sustain the movement's fervent base. Commentators argue that a calculating performance is broadcast to elicit emotional and financial returns from followers: ​ Lying on Camera: Systematically promoting demonstrable falsehoods to create a separate reality for their base. ​ Crying on Cue: Using manufactured moments of outrage or victimhood to generate sympathy and fervor. ​ The Follower Funding Machine: Sitting back as these performances allegedly prompt millions...

The $1 Billion Blunder: Did Melania Trump's Threat Just Hand Michael Wolff a Subpoena to the Epstein Files?

The $1 Billion Blunder: Did Melania Trump's Threat Just Hand Michael Wolff a Subpoena to the Epstein Files? NEW YORK, NY—In a legal escalation that has seized public attention, Michael Wolff, the author known for his disruptive books on the Trump administration, has flipped the script on Melania Trump's billion-dollar defamation threat, using the challenge as an immediate launching pad to demand sworn testimony about the Trumps' ties to Jeffrey Epstein.   The stunning turn of events stems from a legal letter sent by the former First Lady’s attorney, demanding Wolff retract and apologize for statements made in social media videos and a podcast. The claims centered on the assertion that Melania Trump was "very involved" in Epstein's social circle where she met her husband, and that the marriage was a "sham". The letter threatened a lawsuit for over $1 billion in damages, alleging the comments caused "overwhelming reputational and financial harm....