Skip to main content

Advocacy Channels in the USA for AI and Identity Law



By Tres Rivers 

Investigative Journalist

 AUSTIN TEXAS-The U.S. legal framework is different from Denmark's, as it primarily relies on Right of Publicity (mostly state law) and existing Copyright Law (federal law). To push for a new, comprehensive law, you would target federal and state legislators.

​1. Contact Your Federal Representatives

​Since copyright law is governed at the federal level, major changes to grant identity-as-property would require an act of Congress.

  • U.S. House of Representatives and Senate:
    • Find and contact your specific representatives (Senator and House Member). You can call their local or D.C. office, or send an email through their official website.
    • Ask them to introduce or support legislation that would grant individuals an enforceable intellectual property right over their likeness (voice, image, biometrics) and explicitly protect it from unauthorized replication by generative AI.
    • Look for committees that handle intellectual property and technology, such as the Senate Judiciary Committee and the House Judiciary Committee.
  • The U.S. Copyright Office:
    • ​This agency within the Library of Congress advises Congress on copyright policy. They have already launched an initiative to study AI and copyright.
    • Monitor and respond to their Notices of Inquiry (NOIs) or public consultations regarding AI and digital replicas. This is a technical channel for providing public input that directly influences policy recommendations.

​2. Focus on State-Level Legislation

​The Right of Publicity—the right to control the commercial use of your name, likeness, and identity—is primarily a matter of state law in the U.S. Some states already have laws addressing unauthorized "deepfakes," but they are often limited to:

  • Commercial Use: Preventing misuse in advertising.
  • Explicit Content: Criminalizing the non-consensual sharing of deepfake pornography (which is now also partially addressed by federal law like the "Take It Down Act").
  • Contact Your State Legislators:
    • ​Contact your State Senator and State Representative (or Assembly Member).
    • Advocate for a comprehensive state-level Right of Publicity law that explicitly grants citizens ownership of their voice, face, and body data, making it actionable against generative AI misuse, regardless of a commercial motive.

​3. Engage with Federal Regulatory Bodies

​While not the ultimate lawmakers, these agencies are actively shaping rules around AI and consumer protection:

  • Federal Trade Commission (FTC): The FTC focuses on deceptive and unfair business practices. They are examining how AI uses data and could impose regulations on companies that misuse personal likenesses.
    • You can submit comments on ongoing FTC rulemakings or file consumer complaints about deceptive AI practices.

​4. Support Advocacy and Policy Organizations

​Numerous non-profit organizations and industry groups are actively campaigning for AI and digital rights laws.

  • Look for organizations that focus on:
    • ​Intellectual property rights (e.g., guilds, unions for artists, actors, and musicians).
    • ​Digital rights and privacy (e.g., Electronic Frontier Foundation, Future of Privacy Forum).
  • Join their campaigns and support their lobbying efforts, as they often have direct access to policymakers and the legal expertise to draft legislation.

​The Danish proposal is an example of an emerging legal concept. In the U.S., achieving a similar result would likely require a significant legislative effort to either expand the federal definition of Copyright or harmonize and strengthen State Right of Publicity laws.

Popular posts from this blog

📢 Social Media Statement: Defending Free Speech Against Surveillance

​ 🚨 ATTENTION: To any government agency or operative monitoring this account: ​I am an American Citizen. My activity on this platform is a direct exercise of my First Amendment right to Free Speech . ​ I am not organizing, promoting, or engaging in political violence. I am exercising my right to speak out about government actions, alleged corruption, and perceived abuse, and I maintain my right to attend PEACEFUL assemblies to advocate for change. ​Any attempt by a U.S. government entity (including law enforcement, intelligence agencies, or operatives using surveillance or fake accounts) to: ​ Spy on or track my lawful political speech. ​ Gather information to falsely claim a law is being broken. ​ Engage in entrapment based on my expression of dissent. ​...is a direct and illegal violation of my Constitutional rights. ​The recent National Security Presidential Memorandum NSPM-7 —which critics fear is redefining legitimate opposition as "domestic terrorism" an...

The Democratic Counter-Force: New Voices Rising Against the MAGA Movement

By M. Grey ​The political landscape is shifting. A powerful, outspoken coalition of liberal Democrats—from Congress to the cutting edge of digital media—is meeting the narratives of the MAGA movement with an unapologetic and aggressive defense of democratic ideals. They are the new voices of democracy, and they are not afraid to speak up. ​💥 Exposing the Engine of Influence: The Alleged MAGA Playbook ​A core mission of this counter-movement is to pull back the curtain on the tactics allegedly used to cultivate and sustain the movement's fervent base. Commentators argue that a calculating performance is broadcast to elicit emotional and financial returns from followers: ​ Lying on Camera: Systematically promoting demonstrable falsehoods to create a separate reality for their base. ​ Crying on Cue: Using manufactured moments of outrage or victimhood to generate sympathy and fervor. ​ The Follower Funding Machine: Sitting back as these performances allegedly prompt millions...

The $1 Billion Blunder: Did Melania Trump's Threat Just Hand Michael Wolff a Subpoena to the Epstein Files?

The $1 Billion Blunder: Did Melania Trump's Threat Just Hand Michael Wolff a Subpoena to the Epstein Files? NEW YORK, NY—In a legal escalation that has seized public attention, Michael Wolff, the author known for his disruptive books on the Trump administration, has flipped the script on Melania Trump's billion-dollar defamation threat, using the challenge as an immediate launching pad to demand sworn testimony about the Trumps' ties to Jeffrey Epstein.   The stunning turn of events stems from a legal letter sent by the former First Lady’s attorney, demanding Wolff retract and apologize for statements made in social media videos and a podcast. The claims centered on the assertion that Melania Trump was "very involved" in Epstein's social circle where she met her husband, and that the marriage was a "sham". The letter threatened a lawsuit for over $1 billion in damages, alleging the comments caused "overwhelming reputational and financial harm....