Skip to main content

🏛️ US Congress Demands Answers: Lawmakers Push Andrew to Testify on Epstein Secrets



​Washington D.C. – The spotlight on Prince Andrew's association with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein is once again intensifying, driven by a vocal group of US lawmakers determined to uncover the full truth of Epstein's vast criminal network. Led primarily by influential members of the House Oversight Committee, these Representatives are calling for the Duke of York to fully cooperate and even testify before Congress regarding his knowledge of the late financier's illicit activities.

​The renewed legislative push centers on the belief that individuals close to Epstein, regardless of their status, hold crucial information needed for justice for the victims. The bipartisan calls for action indicate that the Epstein saga remains a high-priority issue on Capitol Hill.

​Leading Voices Demand Testimony and Transparency

​Several key members of the House of Representatives have taken the lead in demanding transparency from Prince Andrew:

  • ​Representative Ro Khanna (D-CA): As a member of the Oversight Committee, Rep. Khanna has been explicit in his call for the former royal to testify. He maintains that the public deserves to know who may have aided or been aware of the abuses committed alongside Epstein.

  • ​Representative Suhas Subramanyam (D-VA): Also on the Oversight Committee, Rep. Subramanyam has urged Prince Andrew to come forward, suggesting that testifying could be an opportunity for the Prince to "clear his name" and assist in the ongoing pursuit of justice.

  • ​Representative Robert Garcia (D-CA): The ranking Democrat on the Oversight Committee, Rep. Garcia, has focused on utilizing the committee's power to obtain and release all relevant documents related to the Epstein estate, a move intended to shine a light on everyone connected to the scandal.

  • ​Representative Thomas Massie (R-KY): Working across the aisle, Rep. Massie has partnered with Rep. Khanna on legislation aimed at forcing the release of all government files connected to Epstein, underscoring the bipartisan commitment to full disclosure.

​Beyond the House: A Bipartisan Pursuit of Justice

​While the most direct and publicly aggressive demands for testimony have come from the House, the sentiment reflects a wider resolve within the US legislative branch. Lawmakers are not merely focused on Andrew's specific allegations—which he settled in a civil suit with accuser Virginia Giuffre—but on extracting any information he might have about the broader network of individuals involved.

​The representatives argue that Prince Andrew, who was a close associate of Epstein and was named in documents released from the financier's estate, is uniquely positioned to offer insights.

​"This is about making sure that rich and powerful people don't get away with these heinous crimes, regardless of how much money they have or how much power they have," stated one of the Representatives, summarizing the motivation behind the congressional pressure.

​The move by US lawmakers signals a determined effort to ensure that status and privilege do not shield individuals from accountability in the sprawling, international sex trafficking case.

Written by Tres Rivers

Journalist for HARP ON THE TRUTH

@tresrivers.bsky.social

@harponthetruth bsky social

photo credit by The Chronicle

Popular posts from this blog

📢 Social Media Statement: Defending Free Speech Against Surveillance

​ 🚨 ATTENTION: To any government agency or operative monitoring this account: ​I am an American Citizen. My activity on this platform is a direct exercise of my First Amendment right to Free Speech . ​ I am not organizing, promoting, or engaging in political violence. I am exercising my right to speak out about government actions, alleged corruption, and perceived abuse, and I maintain my right to attend PEACEFUL assemblies to advocate for change. ​Any attempt by a U.S. government entity (including law enforcement, intelligence agencies, or operatives using surveillance or fake accounts) to: ​ Spy on or track my lawful political speech. ​ Gather information to falsely claim a law is being broken. ​ Engage in entrapment based on my expression of dissent. ​...is a direct and illegal violation of my Constitutional rights. ​The recent National Security Presidential Memorandum NSPM-7 —which critics fear is redefining legitimate opposition as "domestic terrorism" an...
Read more

The Democratic Counter-Force: New Voices Rising Against the MAGA Movement

By M. Grey ​The political landscape is shifting. A powerful, outspoken coalition of liberal Democrats—from Congress to the cutting edge of digital media—is meeting the narratives of the MAGA movement with an unapologetic and aggressive defense of democratic ideals. They are the new voices of democracy, and they are not afraid to speak up. ​💥 Exposing the Engine of Influence: The Alleged MAGA Playbook ​A core mission of this counter-movement is to pull back the curtain on the tactics allegedly used to cultivate and sustain the movement's fervent base. Commentators argue that a calculating performance is broadcast to elicit emotional and financial returns from followers: ​ Lying on Camera: Systematically promoting demonstrable falsehoods to create a separate reality for their base. ​ Crying on Cue: Using manufactured moments of outrage or victimhood to generate sympathy and fervor. ​ The Follower Funding Machine: Sitting back as these performances allegedly prompt millions...
Read more

The $1 Billion Blunder: Did Melania Trump's Threat Just Hand Michael Wolff a Subpoena to the Epstein Files?

The $1 Billion Blunder: Did Melania Trump's Threat Just Hand Michael Wolff a Subpoena to the Epstein Files? NEW YORK, NY—In a legal escalation that has seized public attention, Michael Wolff, the author known for his disruptive books on the Trump administration, has flipped the script on Melania Trump's billion-dollar defamation threat, using the challenge as an immediate launching pad to demand sworn testimony about the Trumps' ties to Jeffrey Epstein.   The stunning turn of events stems from a legal letter sent by the former First Lady’s attorney, demanding Wolff retract and apologize for statements made in social media videos and a podcast. The claims centered on the assertion that Melania Trump was "very involved" in Epstein's social circle where she met her husband, and that the marriage was a "sham". The letter threatened a lawsuit for over $1 billion in damages, alleging the comments caused "overwhelming reputational and financial harm....
Read more