Skip to main content

PRIVACY IN PERIL: DOGE's Data Grab and Palantir's Role in Alleged 'Master Database' Plan

The Trump administration's effort to streamline government data, spearheaded by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), has ignited a firestorm over American citizens' privacy. Reports, fiercely denied by the company involved, suggest a plan to use the technology of data-mining giant Palantir to construct a single, government-wide "mega-database" consolidating highly sensitive personal information.
The controversy centers on DOGE’s mission to break down "information silos" across federal agencies—a mandate critics claim is a euphemism for creating a searchable, centralized hub of citizens' data. According to reports in publications like The New York Times, DOGE’s operatives aggressively collected data, and the administration subsequently advanced plans to leverage Palantir’s software to merge records from agencies such as the IRS, Social Security Administration (SSA), and the Treasury Department.
Lawmakers and privacy advocates warn that such a database could aggregate everything from tax filings and bank account numbers to health claims and immigration status, creating a universal profile on nearly every person in the country. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Senator Ron Wyden were among those who publicly raised the alarm, demanding answers and alleging that the plan constituted a "grave assault" on Americans' privacy and potentially violated federal laws, including the Privacy Act of 1974.
Palantir Issues Vehement Denial
In the face of the mounting backlash, Palantir, co-founded by tech billionaire Peter Thiel, has issued firm denials. The company maintains that it is not building a "master database" for the government and has explicitly stated it has no contract or project to unify data across all federal agencies.
In a public statement, Palantir asserted it is "neither conducting nor enabling mass surveillance of American citizens" and does not access or compile data for its own use. It characterized its work, which includes existing contracts with agencies like the IRS, as modernization efforts designed to ensure appropriate security and privacy controls.
Despite Palantir's rebuttals, the reports have already sparked legal challenges. Multiple lawsuits have been filed against DOGE and various federal agencies, citing concerns over the unauthorized disclosure and transfer of sensitive personal records without the proper legal safeguards or public transparency. The conflict highlights a growing national tension between the government's pursuit of "efficiency" through data centralization and the public's right to privacy.

Reported by
Harp on the Truth,Staff Writer

Popular posts from this blog

📢 Social Media Statement: Defending Free Speech Against Surveillance

​ 🚨 ATTENTION: To any government agency or operative monitoring this account: ​I am an American Citizen. My activity on this platform is a direct exercise of my First Amendment right to Free Speech . ​ I am not organizing, promoting, or engaging in political violence. I am exercising my right to speak out about government actions, alleged corruption, and perceived abuse, and I maintain my right to attend PEACEFUL assemblies to advocate for change. ​Any attempt by a U.S. government entity (including law enforcement, intelligence agencies, or operatives using surveillance or fake accounts) to: ​ Spy on or track my lawful political speech. ​ Gather information to falsely claim a law is being broken. ​ Engage in entrapment based on my expression of dissent. ​...is a direct and illegal violation of my Constitutional rights. ​The recent National Security Presidential Memorandum NSPM-7 —which critics fear is redefining legitimate opposition as "domestic terrorism" an...
Read more

The $1 Billion Blunder: Did Melania Trump's Threat Just Hand Michael Wolff a Subpoena to the Epstein Files?

The $1 Billion Blunder: Did Melania Trump's Threat Just Hand Michael Wolff a Subpoena to the Epstein Files? NEW YORK, NY—In a legal escalation that has seized public attention, Michael Wolff, the author known for his disruptive books on the Trump administration, has flipped the script on Melania Trump's billion-dollar defamation threat, using the challenge as an immediate launching pad to demand sworn testimony about the Trumps' ties to Jeffrey Epstein.   The stunning turn of events stems from a legal letter sent by the former First Lady’s attorney, demanding Wolff retract and apologize for statements made in social media videos and a podcast. The claims centered on the assertion that Melania Trump was "very involved" in Epstein's social circle where she met her husband, and that the marriage was a "sham". The letter threatened a lawsuit for over $1 billion in damages, alleging the comments caused "overwhelming reputational and financial harm....
Read more

White House East Wing Demolished for Trump's $250 Million Private Ballroom

WASHINGTON D.C. — In a move stirring both anticipation and controversy, demolition has officially begun on a section of the historic White House East Wing, making way for what will be known as "The Donald J. Trump Ballroom at the White House." This ambitious project, projected to cost an estimated $250 million, is being financed entirely through a combination of private donations and a personal contribution from President Trump. ​The planned 90,000-square-foot annex represents one of the most significant expansions to the Executive Residence in over a century. Envisioned as a grand venue capable of hosting up to 999 guests, it aims to replace the current East Room, which President Trump has deemed too small for modern state dinners and large official gatherings, often necessitating the construction of temporary tents on the South Lawn. ​However, the project is not without its critics. The decision to fund such a substantial renovation with private money has raised eyebrows...
Read more