Skip to main content

Epstein, Wolff, and Cohen: Strategy and Scandal in the Trump Orbit

This image shows an email exchange on December 1, 2018, between author Michael Wolff and a recipient identified only as "J" using the email address jjeevacation@gmail.com.
The search results confirm that the email address jjeevacation@gmail.com belonged to Jeffrey Epstein. The email you provided is part of the larger cache of documents released by the U.S. House Oversight Committee.
📧 The Exchange Explained
The conversation is a rapid-fire discussion between Michael Wolff and Jeffrey Epstein about public relations strategy for handling negative media coverage and legal issues involving Donald Trump, particularly those related to payments to women.
The key points of the exchange are:
The Crisis: Wolff describes the claims they are discussing as "ludicrous and self-serving" but acknowledges they have "won the high ground—young, vulnerable, poor girls," indicating the issue involves sympathetic alleged victims. This is almost certainly referencing the legal and political fallout surrounding the hush money payments that Michael Cohen was facing charges for at the time (involving Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal).
Epstein's Strategy Suggestion (from "J"): Epstein (jjeevacation@gmail.com) suggests a specific media strategy to deflect the narrative:
"Do you think we highlight . . . that at the end of the day it was prostitution. sex for money. . . with state laws."
Goal: This suggestion attempts to minimize the political damage and moral condemnation by reframing the alleged conduct as a common, state-level crime of prostitution, rather than an abuse of power or a federal campaign finance violation (which Cohen was facing).
Wolff's Rejection: Wolff immediately advises against that line of messaging, saying, "don't tweet this" and noting that it "is going against virtue itself."
Wolff's Call for a Unified Strategy: Wolff concludes by advocating for a carefully planned, comprehensive PR strategy, rather than "a piecemeal response" or a quick tweet, to "game out everything" and create a structure for thinking through the problem.

Tres Rivers, Journalist

Popular posts from this blog

📢 Social Media Statement: Defending Free Speech Against Surveillance

​ 🚨 ATTENTION: To any government agency or operative monitoring this account: ​I am an American Citizen. My activity on this platform is a direct exercise of my First Amendment right to Free Speech . ​ I am not organizing, promoting, or engaging in political violence. I am exercising my right to speak out about government actions, alleged corruption, and perceived abuse, and I maintain my right to attend PEACEFUL assemblies to advocate for change. ​Any attempt by a U.S. government entity (including law enforcement, intelligence agencies, or operatives using surveillance or fake accounts) to: ​ Spy on or track my lawful political speech. ​ Gather information to falsely claim a law is being broken. ​ Engage in entrapment based on my expression of dissent. ​...is a direct and illegal violation of my Constitutional rights. ​The recent National Security Presidential Memorandum NSPM-7 —which critics fear is redefining legitimate opposition as "domestic terrorism" an...

The Democratic Counter-Force: New Voices Rising Against the MAGA Movement

By M. Grey ​The political landscape is shifting. A powerful, outspoken coalition of liberal Democrats—from Congress to the cutting edge of digital media—is meeting the narratives of the MAGA movement with an unapologetic and aggressive defense of democratic ideals. They are the new voices of democracy, and they are not afraid to speak up. ​💥 Exposing the Engine of Influence: The Alleged MAGA Playbook ​A core mission of this counter-movement is to pull back the curtain on the tactics allegedly used to cultivate and sustain the movement's fervent base. Commentators argue that a calculating performance is broadcast to elicit emotional and financial returns from followers: ​ Lying on Camera: Systematically promoting demonstrable falsehoods to create a separate reality for their base. ​ Crying on Cue: Using manufactured moments of outrage or victimhood to generate sympathy and fervor. ​ The Follower Funding Machine: Sitting back as these performances allegedly prompt millions...

The $1 Billion Blunder: Did Melania Trump's Threat Just Hand Michael Wolff a Subpoena to the Epstein Files?

The $1 Billion Blunder: Did Melania Trump's Threat Just Hand Michael Wolff a Subpoena to the Epstein Files? NEW YORK, NY—In a legal escalation that has seized public attention, Michael Wolff, the author known for his disruptive books on the Trump administration, has flipped the script on Melania Trump's billion-dollar defamation threat, using the challenge as an immediate launching pad to demand sworn testimony about the Trumps' ties to Jeffrey Epstein.   The stunning turn of events stems from a legal letter sent by the former First Lady’s attorney, demanding Wolff retract and apologize for statements made in social media videos and a podcast. The claims centered on the assertion that Melania Trump was "very involved" in Epstein's social circle where she met her husband, and that the marriage was a "sham". The letter threatened a lawsuit for over $1 billion in damages, alleging the comments caused "overwhelming reputational and financial harm....