Skip to main content

⚖️ The Transparency Test: Why Public Trust Requires Full Disclosure in the Homan Case

​Public Figures vs. Private Finances

​In the United States, public officials surrender some degree of privacy, particularly concerning their finances. This is institutionalized through the Ethics in Government Act of 1978, which mandates that senior officials file public financial disclosure reports (SF 278). The purpose of these reports is to:

  1. ​Identify potential conflicts of interest between official duties and private financial interests.
  2. ​Provide transparency on income sources, assets, and liabilities.

​In the case of Tom Homan, these public reports are the legal and ethical pathway for public scrutiny of his finances.

​Journalistic Standards on Bank Accounts

​Journalistic ethics prohibit unauthorized access to private, non-public information like personal bank accounts. Mainstream journalism is bound by the law and ethical standards that protect the private lives of individuals.

  • ​Financial Records: A bank account is private and is generally not accessible to the media or the public. Any attempt by a journalist to illegally obtain such records would constitute a severe ethical and legal breach.
  • ​Focus on Public Documents: Reporters seeking to trace the flow of the alleged $50,000 must rely on legal avenues, such as public financial disclosure forms (checking if the cash was declared), official court documents (if charges were filed), or subpoenaed records if a new investigation or congressional probe were to reopen.

​The Path to Resolution: Release the Tapes

​The only way to definitively address the public's demand for accountability, short of a legally complex and unauthorized review of private bank records, is for the government to release the FBI's audio and video recordings. These recordings are the definitive public asset that directly addresses the question of alleged corruption and the subsequent political decision to close the case.

​Until that footage is disclosed, the shadow of corruption will continue to undermine faith in the institutions tasked with upholding the law. True transparency requires the DOJ and the FBI to put the evidence before the public and let citizens judge the credibility of the investigation’s closure for themselves.

Popular posts from this blog

📢 Social Media Statement: Defending Free Speech Against Surveillance

​ 🚨 ATTENTION: To any government agency or operative monitoring this account: ​I am an American Citizen. My activity on this platform is a direct exercise of my First Amendment right to Free Speech . ​ I am not organizing, promoting, or engaging in political violence. I am exercising my right to speak out about government actions, alleged corruption, and perceived abuse, and I maintain my right to attend PEACEFUL assemblies to advocate for change. ​Any attempt by a U.S. government entity (including law enforcement, intelligence agencies, or operatives using surveillance or fake accounts) to: ​ Spy on or track my lawful political speech. ​ Gather information to falsely claim a law is being broken. ​ Engage in entrapment based on my expression of dissent. ​...is a direct and illegal violation of my Constitutional rights. ​The recent National Security Presidential Memorandum NSPM-7 —which critics fear is redefining legitimate opposition as "domestic terrorism" an...
Read more

The $1 Billion Blunder: Did Melania Trump's Threat Just Hand Michael Wolff a Subpoena to the Epstein Files?

The $1 Billion Blunder: Did Melania Trump's Threat Just Hand Michael Wolff a Subpoena to the Epstein Files? NEW YORK, NY—In a legal escalation that has seized public attention, Michael Wolff, the author known for his disruptive books on the Trump administration, has flipped the script on Melania Trump's billion-dollar defamation threat, using the challenge as an immediate launching pad to demand sworn testimony about the Trumps' ties to Jeffrey Epstein.   The stunning turn of events stems from a legal letter sent by the former First Lady’s attorney, demanding Wolff retract and apologize for statements made in social media videos and a podcast. The claims centered on the assertion that Melania Trump was "very involved" in Epstein's social circle where she met her husband, and that the marriage was a "sham". The letter threatened a lawsuit for over $1 billion in damages, alleging the comments caused "overwhelming reputational and financial harm....
Read more

White House East Wing Demolished for Trump's $250 Million Private Ballroom

WASHINGTON D.C. — In a move stirring both anticipation and controversy, demolition has officially begun on a section of the historic White House East Wing, making way for what will be known as "The Donald J. Trump Ballroom at the White House." This ambitious project, projected to cost an estimated $250 million, is being financed entirely through a combination of private donations and a personal contribution from President Trump. ​The planned 90,000-square-foot annex represents one of the most significant expansions to the Executive Residence in over a century. Envisioned as a grand venue capable of hosting up to 999 guests, it aims to replace the current East Room, which President Trump has deemed too small for modern state dinners and large official gatherings, often necessitating the construction of temporary tents on the South Lawn. ​However, the project is not without its critics. The decision to fund such a substantial renovation with private money has raised eyebrows...
Read more