Skip to main content

🚨 Stop The Shred: Scott Toilet Paper's Disappearing Act

For generations, families trusted Scott toilet paper, a product of Kimberly-Clark, as the economical, no-frills choice that protected their septic systems. Today, that trust is dissolving faster than the tissue itself. The long-standing, dependable single-ply is undergoing a dramatic, profit-driven downgrade, leaving consumers with a product so thin it's being compared to "crepe paper." This isn't just about a drop in quality; it's a blatant example of shrinkflation, where you pay the same—or more—for drastically less.
💸 Thinner Paper, Fatter Profits
This is the cold, hard math of corporate finance applied to your bathroom budget. While Kimberly-Clark avoids a huge price hike that would shock customers, they quietly cut the most important element: the actual fiber you rely on.
The Weight Loss: The evidence is clear. A decade ago, a four-pack of Scott 1000 weighed approximately two pounds. Today, that same four-pack often weighs barely over one pound. They can still advertise "1,000 sheets," but a sheet of thin air is still a sheet.
The Sheet Shrinkage: The sheets themselves have been documented to shrink, losing valuable square inches. That means you're already reaching for more paper before you even account for the decreased thickness.
The Crepe Paper Crisis: The most frequent and frustrating complaint is the immediate disintegration upon contact. This means users are forced to wrap their hands multiple times, effectively doubling or tripling the amount used per bathroom trip. You are paying for 1,000 sheets, but you are forced to use 2,000 or 3,000 worth of material to get the job done.
This strategy is not value; it's a stealth price increase—a cynical move to push their profit margins higher at your expense.
✊ The Call to Action: Why We Must Fight Back
The market only changes when consumers demand it. This decline in quality is an attack on both your wallet and the basic functionality of a necessity. We have the power to stop this race to the bottom.
1. STOP BUYING (If You Can):
The only language major corporations understand is sales figures. If you are not tied to Scott for septic reasons, switch brands today. Explore competing value brands or store-brand alternatives. By diverting your money, you send an undeniable signal to Kimberly-Clark that this cost-cutting has consequences.
2. COMPLAIN LOUDLY and Publicly:
Don't just grumble in your bathroom. Use your voice where it counts:
Contact Kimberly-Clark directly. Demand an explanation for the drop in material quality. Be ready with the product numbers from the cardboard tube.
Post and share your experience on social media platforms like Reddit, Facebook, and X (formerly Twitter). Use the hashtag #StopTheShred and tag the brand and retailers.
Leave detailed, one-star reviews on retailer websites (Walmart, Amazon, Home Depot). Focus on the thinness, tearing, and the resulting need to use excessive amounts.
3. ADVOCATE for Septic Users:
For those who rely on Scott for septic safety, the situation is tougher. Demand that Kimberly-Clark offer a "Septic-Safe PLUS" line that maintains the necessary dissolvability without the wafer-thin compromise. We shouldn't have to choose between functional plumbing and a product that actually works.
The days of silently accepting shrinkflation are over. Every roll of Scott toilet paper we refuse to buy is a vote against corporations prioritizing shareholder profits over product integrity.

Popular posts from this blog

📢 Social Media Statement: Defending Free Speech Against Surveillance

​ 🚨 ATTENTION: To any government agency or operative monitoring this account: ​I am an American Citizen. My activity on this platform is a direct exercise of my First Amendment right to Free Speech . ​ I am not organizing, promoting, or engaging in political violence. I am exercising my right to speak out about government actions, alleged corruption, and perceived abuse, and I maintain my right to attend PEACEFUL assemblies to advocate for change. ​Any attempt by a U.S. government entity (including law enforcement, intelligence agencies, or operatives using surveillance or fake accounts) to: ​ Spy on or track my lawful political speech. ​ Gather information to falsely claim a law is being broken. ​ Engage in entrapment based on my expression of dissent. ​...is a direct and illegal violation of my Constitutional rights. ​The recent National Security Presidential Memorandum NSPM-7 —which critics fear is redefining legitimate opposition as "domestic terrorism" an...

The $1 Billion Blunder: Did Melania Trump's Threat Just Hand Michael Wolff a Subpoena to the Epstein Files?

The $1 Billion Blunder: Did Melania Trump's Threat Just Hand Michael Wolff a Subpoena to the Epstein Files? NEW YORK, NY—In a legal escalation that has seized public attention, Michael Wolff, the author known for his disruptive books on the Trump administration, has flipped the script on Melania Trump's billion-dollar defamation threat, using the challenge as an immediate launching pad to demand sworn testimony about the Trumps' ties to Jeffrey Epstein.   The stunning turn of events stems from a legal letter sent by the former First Lady’s attorney, demanding Wolff retract and apologize for statements made in social media videos and a podcast. The claims centered on the assertion that Melania Trump was "very involved" in Epstein's social circle where she met her husband, and that the marriage was a "sham". The letter threatened a lawsuit for over $1 billion in damages, alleging the comments caused "overwhelming reputational and financial harm....

White House East Wing Demolished for Trump's $250 Million Private Ballroom

WASHINGTON D.C. — In a move stirring both anticipation and controversy, demolition has officially begun on a section of the historic White House East Wing, making way for what will be known as "The Donald J. Trump Ballroom at the White House." This ambitious project, projected to cost an estimated $250 million, is being financed entirely through a combination of private donations and a personal contribution from President Trump. ​The planned 90,000-square-foot annex represents one of the most significant expansions to the Executive Residence in over a century. Envisioned as a grand venue capable of hosting up to 999 guests, it aims to replace the current East Room, which President Trump has deemed too small for modern state dinners and large official gatherings, often necessitating the construction of temporary tents on the South Lawn. ​However, the project is not without its critics. The decision to fund such a substantial renovation with private money has raised eyebrows...