Skip to main content

​📰 Lawsuits Targeting BNY Mellon and Bank of America Over Epstein Ties Intensify

​

The legal battle over Jeffrey Epstein's financial enablers has intensified, with recent lawsuits filed against Bank of New York Mellon (BNY Mellon) and Bank of America (BofA) becoming the central focus of victims' efforts to hold institutions accountable. These lawsuits allege the banks knowingly provided critical financial infrastructure for Epstein’s sex trafficking operations and are facing aggressive pushback from the banks themselves.

​Latest Developments in the Courtroom

  • ​Contested Status: Unlike JPMorgan Chase and Deutsche Bank, which reached settlements with victims in 2023, neither BNY Mellon nor Bank of America has settled. Both banks are actively contesting the claims, asserting the allegations are "meritless" and vowing to "vigorously defend" themselves in federal court.
  • ​The Allegations of Financial Complicity: Lawsuits filed by anonymous plaintiffs—including one "Jane Doe" who claims abuse over eight years—allege that the banks chose "profit over protecting the victims." Specifically, the suits accuse the banks of:
    • ​Failure to File SARs: Neglecting to file required Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) on transactions linked to Epstein and his co-conspirators until after Epstein's 2019 death, despite numerous financial red flags.
    • ​Processing Vast Sums: Processing an estimated $1.5 billion in Epstein-linked transactions over a period of many years without adequate regulatory action.
    • ​BNY Mellon's Specific Exposure: The suit against BNY Mellon alleges the bank processed approximately $378 million in suspicious transactions, while Bank of America is cited for allegedly handling accounts used by Epstein's associates and victims.

​Escalating Political and Regulatory Pressure

​The lawsuits have coincided with a sharp increase in government scrutiny:

  • ​Congressional Demand for Records: The House Judiciary Committee, led by Rep. Jamie Raskin, has been applying significant pressure on the CEOs of BNY Mellon and Bank of America, demanding documents and communications related to Epstein's accounts to understand the full scope of their relationship and failures in regulatory compliance.
  • ​Call for Banker Bans: Senator Elizabeth Warren has publicly called on the Federal Reserve, the OCC, and the FDIC to open formal investigations into any current or former US banking executives who may have aided Epstein’s crimes. Warren suggests that evidence of wrongdoing could lead to a ban from working in the U.S. financial sector for these individuals.

​Attorneys representing the victims believe that if the courts do not dismiss these cases, the pressure—combined with the immense public relations risk—will likely lead to settlements that could provide compensation and force further disclosure of information surrounding Epstein's financial network.

Reported by @harponthetruth.bsky.social

#harponthetruth

#jeffreyEpstein

#BankofMelon

#SenatorElizabethWarren

#jamieraskin

#bnymelon

#sextraffickinh


Popular posts from this blog

📢 Social Media Statement: Defending Free Speech Against Surveillance

​ 🚨 ATTENTION: To any government agency or operative monitoring this account: ​I am an American Citizen. My activity on this platform is a direct exercise of my First Amendment right to Free Speech . ​ I am not organizing, promoting, or engaging in political violence. I am exercising my right to speak out about government actions, alleged corruption, and perceived abuse, and I maintain my right to attend PEACEFUL assemblies to advocate for change. ​Any attempt by a U.S. government entity (including law enforcement, intelligence agencies, or operatives using surveillance or fake accounts) to: ​ Spy on or track my lawful political speech. ​ Gather information to falsely claim a law is being broken. ​ Engage in entrapment based on my expression of dissent. ​...is a direct and illegal violation of my Constitutional rights. ​The recent National Security Presidential Memorandum NSPM-7 —which critics fear is redefining legitimate opposition as "domestic terrorism" an...
Read more

The Democratic Counter-Force: New Voices Rising Against the MAGA Movement

By M. Grey ​The political landscape is shifting. A powerful, outspoken coalition of liberal Democrats—from Congress to the cutting edge of digital media—is meeting the narratives of the MAGA movement with an unapologetic and aggressive defense of democratic ideals. They are the new voices of democracy, and they are not afraid to speak up. ​💥 Exposing the Engine of Influence: The Alleged MAGA Playbook ​A core mission of this counter-movement is to pull back the curtain on the tactics allegedly used to cultivate and sustain the movement's fervent base. Commentators argue that a calculating performance is broadcast to elicit emotional and financial returns from followers: ​ Lying on Camera: Systematically promoting demonstrable falsehoods to create a separate reality for their base. ​ Crying on Cue: Using manufactured moments of outrage or victimhood to generate sympathy and fervor. ​ The Follower Funding Machine: Sitting back as these performances allegedly prompt millions...
Read more

The $1 Billion Blunder: Did Melania Trump's Threat Just Hand Michael Wolff a Subpoena to the Epstein Files?

The $1 Billion Blunder: Did Melania Trump's Threat Just Hand Michael Wolff a Subpoena to the Epstein Files? NEW YORK, NY—In a legal escalation that has seized public attention, Michael Wolff, the author known for his disruptive books on the Trump administration, has flipped the script on Melania Trump's billion-dollar defamation threat, using the challenge as an immediate launching pad to demand sworn testimony about the Trumps' ties to Jeffrey Epstein.   The stunning turn of events stems from a legal letter sent by the former First Lady’s attorney, demanding Wolff retract and apologize for statements made in social media videos and a podcast. The claims centered on the assertion that Melania Trump was "very involved" in Epstein's social circle where she met her husband, and that the marriage was a "sham". The letter threatened a lawsuit for over $1 billion in damages, alleging the comments caused "overwhelming reputational and financial harm....
Read more